When you are installing feature files from a remote source, the source path or file share must grant Read permissions either to the Everyone group (not recommended for security reasons), or to the computer (local system) account of the destination server; granting user account
access is not sufficient.
Servers that are in workgroups cannot access external file shares, even if the computer account for the workgroup server has Read permissions on the external share. Alternate source locations that work for workgroup servers include installation media, Windows Update, and VHD or WIM files that are stored on the local workgroup
server.
# This command restores the optional feature, MyFeature, to the Online Windows image. If the files are not found in the source image, this command specifies not
to check Windows Update for the source files.
# This command restores the optional feature, MyFeature, to the Online Windows image. If the files are not found in the source image, this command specifies not
to check Windows Update for the source files.
Au niveau de RGPD (réf. Art. 5.2), il y a une différence importante pour les francophones et les anglophones.
Téléchargez les versions ici: https://ffwd2.me/gdpr
Le GDPR en anglais, fait référence à “accountability”
Le RGPD (FR) parle de « responsabilité » (personnel) seulement.
En fait, “accountability” (EN) = rendre compte (FR)
Mais “responsability” en anglais est aussi traduit en “responsabilité” (général) en français.
Pour la bonne compréhension, il est important de savoir qu’il y a une différence.
“accountability” en anglais,
veut dire “responsabilité personnel/individuelle”, rendre compte
s’applique typiquement
sur 1 personne,
Après les faits
Réf. au tribunal/juge
“responsability” en anglais,
Veut dire “responsabilité générale”
S’applique
Sur un group, plusieurs personnes
Qui planifie et prend soin des tâches, en avance/pendant
En plus, au niveau de GDPR, il y a une 2ème différence important expliqué dans GDPR considérant (4)
Privacy (EN) / vie privée (FR), versus/par contre
Personal data (EN) / données à caractère personnel= “données personnelles” (FR)
Si on parle de “vie privée”, on fait référence au droits fondamentaux, et “le respect de la vie privée et familiale, du domicile et des communications …”
Si on parle des données personnelles, on fait référence à l’info et les attributs qui identifient ou peuvent identifier quelqu’un.
Donc, dans la protection des données, on devrait parler de “données personnelles”.
Et l’histoire est identique pour le néerlandophones… (NL <> FR) 😉
Eg, before tribunal, court, judge…. (who will pay the fines… )
“responsability” (EN),
is rather “general” responsibility
applies to
a group of, or multiple, persons
who plan or execute tasks, in advance or during activities
Furthermore, on the level of GDPR, there is a 2nd important difference, explained in GDPR recital (4)
Privacy (EN) / vie privée (FR), versus
Personal data (EN), données à caractère personnel= “données personnelles” (FR)
If we talk about privacy / vie privée (FR) in GDPR, it’s about “fundamental rights” and «respect for private and family life, home and communications … »
If you talk about personal data, you refer to the information and attributes who identify (“identified”)or can identify an individual (“identifiable”).
So, in data protection (EN), “protection des données” (FR) for GDPR, we should refer to personal data (EN), “données personnelles” (FR).
Did you ever got a mail from yourself, but you’re sure you did not send it?
This week I got that mail from a mail alias I’m using, so it’s actually not a native mailbox, but a mail forwarder address, which makes the claim that “the mailbox is hacked” pretty silly…
But if you got this message from a native mailbox, it does sound scary, isn’t it?
I already had some similar symptoms on other mail addresses in the same domain.
Symptoms
You get a mail from your own mail address… which is called mail spoofing.
And it looks like:
Spoofed mail message content
Hi!
As you may have noticed, I sent you an email from your account.
This means that I have full access to your account.
I’ve been watching you for a few months now.
The fact is that you were infected with malware through an adult site that you visited.
If you are not familiar with this, I will explain.
Trojan Virus gives me full access and control over a computer or other device.
This means that I can see everything on your screen, turn on the camera and microphone, but you do not know about it.
I also have access to all your contacts and all your correspondence.
Why your antivirus did not detect malware?
Answer: My malware uses the driver, I update its signatures every 4 hours so that your antivirus is silent.
I made a video showing how you satisfy yourself in the left half of the screen, and in the right half you see the video that you watched.
With one click of the mouse, I can send this video to all your emails and contacts on social networks.
I can also post access to all your e-mail correspondence and messengers that you use.
If you want to prevent this,
transfer the amount of $778 to my bitcoin address (if you do not know how to do this, write to Google: “Buy Bitcoin”).
My bitcoin address (BTC Wallet) is: 1GoWy5yMzh3XXBiYxLU9tKCBMgibpznGio
After receiving the payment, I will delete the video and you will never hear me again.
I give you 48 hours to pay.
I have a notice reading this letter, and the timer will work when you see this letter.
Filing a complaint somewhere does not make sense because this email cannot be tracked like my bitcoin address.
I do not make any mistakes.
If I find that you have shared this message with someone else, the video will be immediately distributed.
Best regards!
Root cause
The DNS setting of your domain is missing SPF records, that counter mail spoofing (an unauthorized mail server, user or hacker sending mail as “you”)…
Troubleshooting
When looking at the mail properties it’s pretty difficult (if not impossible) to find out who actually has sent the mail….
Solution
Basic domain settings
Add an SPF record to your domain DNS settings.
To get started, look up your mail provider or hosting provider’s name + SFP.
FYI, I’m hosting my domains at one.com, they’ve got some straight forward advise to configure the DNS. For any other domain, at any other provider it’s similar.
Do you also get these annoying ‘Promoted’ advertisement posts on your LinkedIn feed?
I managed to configure AdBlock Plus to kick out the ‘Promoted’ advertisements on LinkedIn… works on FireFox, Chrome, a bit slow on Edge, … (forget about IE…)
I know from the AdBlock forums, it’s not always easy to get it working. It might change with updates to the adblocker or the way the websites work, … so I hope it’s worth sharing it.
The filter configuration might have some duplicates, but at least it works.
Essentially, it’s hiding the ‘Promoted’ ads in your newsfeed and it’s hiding the “Promoted” right hand side of the LinkedIn page…
